Divergent Organizational Change in Hospitals: Exploring how hospital leaders and employees can contribute to successful outcomes


Olaug Øygarden


management, hospital management, sykehusledelse, organisasjonskultur


This thesis consists of three papers that aim to increase our understanding of how divergent changes to organizational structures and management systems in hospitals may be handled by leaders and employees in order to achieve outcomes that contribute towards organizational goals of service quality improvement. Reforms, new policies and the continuous large- and/or small-scale changes aiming for service quality improvement that they manifest in within hospital organizations have been identified as a move away from professional dominance and autonomy, and a move towards a health care system where managerial and market logics are influential. These changes have challenged the organizing principles of professional power in decisions regarding hospital organizational structures and management systems, and professional services are increasingly subject to organizational reform, budgetary control and managerial supervision. Organizational changes that break with existing institutions in a field of activity are defined as divergent. Despite decades of managerial logic initiatives, health care organizations are still heavily influenced by the professional logic. Introducing changes that are based in a managerial or market logic into the work of health service professionals could therefore be considered as divergent, and potentially conflictual, organizational change which would be met with resistance rather than readiness for change and willing participation. We know from previous research that quality improvement initiatives in hospitals very often fail to produce the intended results. We also know that involving health care professionals in processes aimed at improving hospital services is widely considered as a critical factor for achieving goals of quality improvement. However, the most widely documented reaction to divergent change from clinical staff is resistance or active opposition to new arrangements, and this is often identified as the reason for failure in achieving the improvements that change projects aim for. There are few studies of successful outcomes of divergent changes in health care organizations. There are also few empirical studies of professional engagement in such organizational change efforts. This means that there is an identified need for studies that shed light on how successful outcomes occur in a variety of contexts and related to a variety of different types of changes, as well as for more in-depth research on how divergent changes may be handled by hospital leaders and employees in order to achieve outcomes that contribute towards organizational goals of service quality improvement. This thesis raises the two following research questions: How are frequent organizational changes in hospitals and middle manager change-oriented leadership related to organizational and employee outcomes relevant to hospital service quality? How can hospital leaders and employees contribute to processes of implementing divergent changes to organizational structures and management systems in order to achieve outcomes that contribute towards organizational goals of service quality improvement? The first question is answered by Paper 1, titled “Changing to improve? Organizational change and change oriented leadership in hospitals.” The second question is answered by Papers 2 and 3, and an overall discussion of the findings from all three papers.

Author Biography

Olaug Øygarden

Assistant Professor
UiS Business School
E-mail: olaug.oygarden@uis.no


Ackroyd, S., Kirkpatrick, I., & Walker, R. M. (2007). Public management reform in the UK and its consequences for professional organization: A comparative analysis. Public Administration, 85(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00631.x

Andersen, H., & Røvik, K. A. (2015). Lost in translation: A case-study of the travel of lean thinking in a hospital. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1081-z

Andersson, T., & Liff, R. (2018). Co-optation as a response to competing institutional logics: Professionals and managers in healthcare. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(2), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joy001

Arman, R., Liff, R., & Wikström, E. (2014). The hierarchization of competing logics in psychiatric care in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(3), 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2014.01.001

Armenakis, A.A., & Harris, S.G. (2002). Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210423080

Armenakis, A.A., Harris, S.G., & Mossholder, K.W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681- 703. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600601

Boxenbaum, E., & Pedersen, J. S. (2009). Scandinavian institutionalism - a case of institutional work. In T.B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, (pp.178-204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596605.007

Byrkjeflot, H., & Kragh Jespersen, P. (2014). Three conceptualizations of hybrid management in hospitals. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(5), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2012-0162

Choi, S., Holmberg, I., Löwstedt, J., & Brommels, M. (2011). Executive management in radical change: The case of the Karolinska University Hospital merger. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2010.08.002

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2002). New Public Management. The Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012). Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7), 937- 962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612445116

Czarniawska B., & Joerges B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating Organizational Change (pp.13-48). Berlin: Wlater de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879735.13

Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. (2005). Global Ideas. How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in a Global Economy. Copenhagen, DK: Copenhagen Business School Press.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00132

Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299

Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785498

Heldal, F. (2015). Managerial control versus professional autonomy in organizational change: Tearing down the walls and fighting fire with fire. Journal of Change Management, 15(3), 188-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2015.1028573

Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Feild, H. S. (2007). Toward a comprehensive definition of readiness for change: A review of research and instrumentation. In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development (Vol. 16, pp. 289-336). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-3016(06)16009-7

Jones, R. A., Jimmieson, N. L., & Griffiths, A. (2005). The impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: The mediating role of readiness for change. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 361-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00500.x

King, N. (2012). Doing template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.) Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges (pp.426-450). London, UK: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435620.n24

Kirkpatrick, I., Bullinger, B., Lega, F., & Dent, M. (2013). The translation of hospital management models in European health systems: A framework for comparison. British Journal of Management, 24, S48-S61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12030

Kitchener, M. (2002). Mobilizing the logic of managerialism in professional fields: The case of academic health centre mergers. Organization Studies, 23(3), 391-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602233004

Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K.Sahlin (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp.243-275). London, UK: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n10

Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248

Lillrank, P. (1995). The transfer of management innovations from Japan. Organization Studies, 16(6), 971-989. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600603

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Martin, G., Currie, G., Weaver, S., Finn, R., & McDonald, R. (2017). Institutional complexity and individual responses: delineating the boundaries of partial autonomy. Organization Studies, 38(1), 103- 127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616663241

Mascia, D., Morandi, F., & Cicchetti, A. (2014). Looking good or doing better? Patterns of decoupling in the implementation of clinical directorates. Health Care Management Review, 39(2), 111- 123. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0b013e318286095c

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Morris, T., & Lancaster, Z. (2006). Translating management ideas. Organization Studies, 27(2), 207-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605057667

Nielsen, J., Mathiassen, L., & Newell, S. (2014). Theorization and translation in information technology institutionalization: Evidence from Danish home care. MIS Quarterly, 38(1), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.08

Noordegraaf, M. (2015). Hybrid professionalism and beyond: (New) forms of public professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 2(2), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov002

Pache, A.C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972-1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405

Pallas, J., Fredriksson, M., & Wedlin, L. (2016). Translating institutional logics: When the media logic meets professions. Organization Studies, 37(11), 1661-1684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655485

Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267-292. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.267

Radaelli, G., & Sitton-Kent, L. (2016). Middle managers and the translation of new ideas in organizations: a review of micro‐ practices and contingencies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 311-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12094

Rafferty, A. E., Jimmieson, N. L., & Armenakis, A. A. (2013). Change readiness: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 110- 135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312457417

Reay, T., & Hinings, C. B. (2005). The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3), 351-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050872

Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803

Røvik, K. A. (2007). Trender og translasjoner: ideer som former det 21. århundrets organisasjon. Oslo, NO: Universitetsforlaget.

Røvik, K. A. (2011). From fashion to virus: An alternative theory of organizations' handling of management ideas. Organization Studies, 32(5), 631-653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611405426

Røvik, K. A. (2016). Knowledge transfer as translation: Review and elements of an instrumental theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 290-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12097

Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success. The construction of organizational fields and identities. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating Organizational Change (pp.69-92). Berlin: Wlater de Gruyter https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879735.69

Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp.218-242). London, UK: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n9

Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed care. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press.

Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance trading in Lloyd's of London: Balancing conflicting- yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932-970. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0638

Spyridonidis, D., & Currie, G. (2016). The translational role of hybrid nurse middle managers in implementing clinical guidelines: Effect of, and upon, professional and managerial hierarchies. British Journal of Management, 27(4), 760-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12164

Teulier, R., & Rouleau, L. (2013). Middle managers' sensemaking and interorganizational change initiation: Translation spaces and editing practices. Journal of Change Management, 13(3), 308-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2013.822674

Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001

Waldorff, S. B. (2013). Accounting for organizational innovations: Mobilizing institutional logics in translation. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(3), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.03.010

Wedlin, L., & Sahlin, K. 2017. The imitation and translation of management ideas. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R.E. Meyer, & T. Lawrence (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2nd ed.) (pp.102-127). London, UK: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n5

Wæraas, A., & Nielsen, J.A. (2016). Translation theory 'translated': Three perspectives on translation in organizational research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 236-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12092

Wæraas, A., & Sataøen, H. L. (2014). Trapped in conformity? Translating reputation management into practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(2), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.05.002

Cover image



February 17, 2020


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.