Combining Resources: A Participatory Intervention Promoting Organisational Learning, Social Innovation and Interorganisational Collaborations In Criminal Justice


Sarah Hean; Marie Aakjær; Laure Kloetzer; Laura Seppännen; Anu Kajamaa; Päivikki Lahtinen; Tine Murphy


This chapter presents a participatory model for promoting organisational learning and innovation with potential application in criminal justice related organisations. We share the sensemaking process engaged in by the COLAB consortium tasked with comparing and contrasting a range of participatory interventions and developing a potentially hybrid model that combined the strengths of each. We describe this model on 11 key dimensions, that in themselves offer a useful tool through which different participatory methods might be compared. An expanded participatory model based on the Change Laboratory model and expansive learning cycle is presented, one augmented with the beneficial components of Activity Clinics, Boundary crossing workshops and codesign methods and developed within the criminal justice context.

Author Biographies

Sarah Hean

Det samfunnsvitenskapelige fakulte
Universitetet i Stavanger

Marie Aakjær

Associate Professor
Center for Management and Experience Design
University College Absalon

Laure Kloetzer

Assistant Professor
Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines
Université de Neuchâtel

Laura Seppännen
Senior Research Scientist Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Anu Kajamaa

Adjunct Professor
Faculty of Educational Sciences
University of Helsinki

Päivikki Lahtinen

CoLAB Learning Center
University of Agder

Tine Murphy

Associate Professor 
Center for Ledelse og Oplevelsesdesign
University College Absalon


Aakjær, M. (2014) Reconfiguring Boundaries in Social Innovation. Co-creating new meaning and practice in a prison context. PhD dissertation. Aarhus University, Copenhagen.

Aakjær, M. (2018). Co-design in the prison service - A learning perspective on employee-driven innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management (IJEIM), Vol. 22 No. 4/5

Aakjær, M., & Brandt, E. (2012). Social innovation within prison service. Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases-Volume 2.

Aakjær, M. & Darsø, L. (2014). Innovative læringsrum: At krydse grænserne for det (u)mulige. In H. Adriansen, P. Bramming, N. C. Nickelsen, S. Høyrup,

D. Staunæs & K. D. Søndergaard (Eds.), Læringslaboratorier og - eksperimenter. Copenhagen: Aarhus Universitets forlag.

Ala-Laurinaho, A., Kurki, A.-L., & Simonsen Abildgaard, J. (2018). Supporting Sensemaking to Promote a Systemic View of Organizational Changes - Contributions From Activity Theory. Journal of Change Management, 17(4), 367-387.

Akkerman, S. & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects. Review of Educational Research 81(2), 132-169.

Alford, J. (2009) Engaging Public Sector Clients. Baingstoke: Palgrave. Bason, C. (2010) Leading public sector innovation. Bristol: Policy Press.

Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2007). Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: The concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design: Radcliffe Publishing.

Binder, T., Michelis, G.D., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P. & Wagner, I. (2011). Design things. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.

Binder, Löwgren & Malmborg (2009). (Re)searching the Digital Bauhaus. London: Springer

Brandi, U., & Elkjaer, B. (2011). Organizational learning viewed from a social learning perspective. Handbook of organizational learning & knowledge management, 23-41.

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of- practice: towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science, 2, (1) 40-57.

Buchenau, M., & Suri, J. F. (2000, August). Experience prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 424-433). ACM.

Clot, Y. (1999). La fonction psychologique du travail. Paris, PUF.

Clot, Y. (2006). Clinique du travail et clinique de l'activité. Nouvelle revue de psychosociologie, (1), 165-177.

Clot, Y. (2008). Travail et pouvoir d'agir. Paris : PUF.

Clot, Y., Faïta, D., Fernandez, G., & Scheller, L. (2000). Entretiens en autoconfrontation croisée: une méthode en clinique de l'activité. Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé, (2-1).

Clot, Y., Faïta, D., Fernandez, G., & Scheller, L. (2000). Entretiens en autoconfrontation croisée: une méthode en clinique de l'activité. Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé, (2-1).

Clot, Y., & Kostulski, K. (2007). Dialogue, activité, développement. Paris : L'Harmattan.

Darsø, L. (2012). Innovation Competency - An Essential Organizational Asset. In: Høyrup, S. Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Hasse, C., Lotz, M. & Møller, K. (Eds.). Employee-Driven Innovation - A new Approach. Palgrave Macmillan, Hamshire, New York.

Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: Logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Downing-Wilson, D., Lecusay, R. and Cole, M. (2011) Design experimentation and mutual appropriation : Two strategies for university / community collaborative after-school interventions. Theory and Psychology, 21 (5), 656-680

Edwards, A. (2009) From the systemic to relational: Relational agency and activity theory. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels & K. D. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Elkjaer, B. (2003). Social learning theory: Learning as participation in social processes. The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management, 38-53.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: an Activity-theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki; Orienta-Konsultit.

Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Engeström, Y. (2000). From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In P. Luff, J.Hindmarsh, & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Engeström, Y. (2004). New forms of learning in co-configuration work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 11-21.

Engeström, Y. and Sannino, A. (2010) "Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges." Educational Research Review 5: 1-24.

Engeström, Y., Kerosuo, H., & Kajamaa, A. (2007). Beyond discontinuity. Expansive organizational learning remembered. Management Learning, 38(3), 319-336.

Engestrom, Y., Kajamaa, A., Lahtinen, P. & Sannino, A. (2015). Toward a grammar of collaboration. Mind, Culture, and Activity 22(2), 92-111.

Engeström, Y., Sannino, A. and Virkkunen, J. (2014) On the Methodological Demands of Formative Interventions, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21:2, 118-128

Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The Change Laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10-17.

Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: the importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: cultural historical approaches (pp. 345-374). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press

Fuglsang, L. (2010) 'Bricolage and invisible innovation in oublic service innovation',Journal of Innovation Economics, 5, pp. 67-87.

Halse, J., Brandt, E., Clark, B., & Binder, T. (2010). Rehearsing the future: Danish Design School Press.

Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1995), Ethnography: principles in practice, New York: Routledge.

Hasu, M. and Engeström, Y. (2000). Measurement in action: An activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 53, 61-89.

Hean, S., Odegard, A. and Willumsen, E., (2017). Improving collaboration between professionals supporting mentally ill offenders. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 13 (2), 91-104.

Junginger, S. (2007). Change in the making| Organizational change through human- centered product development. Carnegie Mellon University.

Kajamaa, A. (2011). Unraveling the helix of change. An activity-theoretical study of health care change efforts and their consequences. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Studies in Educational Sciences 241.

Kajamaa, A. (2015). Collaborative work development as a resource for innovation and quality improvement in health care: An example from a hospital surgery. In Gurtner, S. and Soyez, K. (Eds). Challenges in health care management - Are we ready for what comes next?, Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Kajamaa, A. & Hilli, A. (2014). Clients' Initiatives and Caregivers' Responses in the Organizational Dynamics of Care Delivery. Qualitative Health Research 24(1), 18-32.

Kajamaa, A. and Lahtinen, P. (2016) Carnivalization as a new mode of collaboration. Journal of Workplace Learning. 28, 4, 188-205.

Kerosuo, H. (2006) Boundaries in Action: An Activity-theoretical Study of Development, Learning and Change in Health Care for Patients with Multiple and Chronic Illnesses, Helsinki: University Press.

Kerosuo, H., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(7/8), 345-351.

Kerosuo, H., Kajamaa, A. and Engeström, Y. (2010). Promoting innovation and learning through Change Laboratory: An example from Finnish Health Care. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4 (1). 110-131.

Kloetzer L., Clot Y., Quillerou-Grivot E. (2015) Stimulating Dialogue at Work: The Activity Clinic Approach to Learning and Development. In: Filliettaz L., Billett S. (eds) Francophone Perspectives of Learning Through Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 12. Springer, Cham

Kodner, D. and Spreeuwenberg, L. C. (2002) 'Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications - a discussion paper', International Journal of Integrated Care, 2, 1-6..

Lahtinen, P; Esko, T; Kajamaa, A; Seppänen, L; Johnsen, B; Hean, S (2018). Addressing reoffending through addressing offender mental health Exploring the viability of the Change Laboratory method as means of promoting social innovation in the delivery of integrated mental health care offenders in prison services.. Stavanger: Universitetet i Stavanger.

Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Liebling, A., Price, D., & Shefer, G. (2010). The prison officer. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London & New York.

Meroni, A., & Sangiorgi, D. (2011). Design for services: Gower Publishing, Ltd. Miettinen, R. (1996) Theories of invention and an industrial innovation. Science Studies, 9(2), 34-48.

Miettinen, R. (2006). The Sources of Novelty: A Cultural and Systemic View of Distributed Creativity. Journal Compilation, Volume 15, Number 2, pp.173-181. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government.

Place:Harvard University Press

Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Working paper, Oxford :Skill Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, Said Business School.

Ombredane, A. & Faverge, J-M. (1955). L'analyse du travail: facteur d'économie humaine et de productivité. Paris: PUF

Penuel, W. R. (2014). Emerging forms of formative intervention research in education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 97-117.

Ruotsala, R. (2014). Developing a tool for cross-functional collaboration: the trajectory of an annual clock. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 15(2), 31-53.

Sannino, A. (2015). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 1-3.

Sannino, A. and Sutter, B. (2011) 'Cultural-historical activity theory and interventionist methodology: Classical legacy and contemporary developments', Theory & Psychology, 21, pp. 557-570.

Sannino, A. and Engeström, Y. (2017). Co-generation of societally impactful knowledge in Change Laboratories. Management Learning, 48(1), 80-96

Sannino, A. and Sutter, B. (2011) 'Cultural-historical activity theory and interventionist methodology: Classical legacy and contemporary developments', Theory & Psychology, 21, 557-570.

Scheller, L. (214) Activity Clinic and Affects in Workplace Conflicts: Transformation through transferential activity, Outlines-Critical Practice Studies 15 (2) (74-92)

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books

Schultz, K-P., Kajamaa, A. and Kerosuo, H. (2015). Creating innovative work practices through reflexive interventions. International Journal of Work Innovation, 1(2), 143-160.

Seppänen, L. (2012). Examining activity concepts: can institutional logics help? Paper presented at the Colloquium of the European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS), Helsinki, Finland.

Seppänen, L., & Koli, A. (2010). Exploring work: Employee stories as tools for promoting workplace well-being. Paper presented at the Towards Better Work and Well-being, 10-12 February 2010, Proceedings:98-104., Helsinki, Finland.

Seppänen, L., & Kloetzer, L. (2014 ). A micro-analysis of concepts for developing networking in social work. In T. Hansson (Ed.), Contemporary Approaches to Activity Theory: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Behavior (pp. 162- 181): Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology

Seppänen, L., Ala-Laurinaho, A., & Piispanen, P. (2015). Logics of fluency in the transformation of the Finnish rail traffic control network. Production, 25(2), 278- 288.

Seppänen, L., & Toiviainen, H. (2017). Relational agency and the development of tools in service networks. In A. Edwards (Ed.), Working relationally in and across practices. A cultural-historical approach to collaboration (pp. 153-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Slappendal, C. 1996. "Perspectives on Innovation in Organizations." Organization Studies 17(1): 107-129.

Stepney, P. et al. (2011) 'Learning to Collaborate: A Study of Nursing Students' Experience of Inter-Professional Education at One UK University', Educational Studies. 37(4), 419-434.

Teräs, M. (2016). Inter-professional working and learning: instructional actions and boundary crossing and boundary making in oral healthcare. Journal of Education and Work, 29 (5)

Thornton, P. H. and Ocasio, W. (2008) 'Institutional Logics', in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. S. (ed.) Handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage : Thousand Oaks, CA,. 99-129.

Toiviainen, H., & Kira, M. (2017). From struggles to resource gains in interprofessional service networks: Key findings from a multiple case study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(4), 479-486.

Victor, B., & Boynton, A. C. (1998). Invented here: Maximizing your organization's internal growth and profitability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Vilela A.G.R., Pereira Querol, M., Antunes Lima, F., Gomes Lopes, M., Almeida, I., Jackson Filho, J. (2014) Work Ergonomic Analysis and Change Laboratory: similarities and complementarities between interventionist methods., in T. Ahram, W. K. and T. M. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics AHFE 2014, Krákow, Poland 19- 23 July 2014. Krakóvia, Poland: The Printing House

Virkkunen, J. (2006). Hybrid agency in co-configuration work. Outlines, 8(1), 61-75.

Virkkunen, J. and Newnham, D. S. (2013). The Change Laboratory - A Tool for Collaborative Development of Work and Education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Vygotsky (1978) Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, (1997) The history of the development of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions. New York: Plenum.

Weick, (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Wisner, A. (1974). Contenu des tâches et charge de travail. Sociologie du travail, 16(16), 339-357.

Cover for Combining Resources: A Participatory Intervention Promoting Organisational Learning, Social Innovation and Interorganisational Collaborations In Criminal Justice
February 21, 2020